despite the memory benchmark tests showing huge memory bandwidth hit. When you roll into application set (or even Photoshop can use it on a hi-res major effect render, etc) that exceeds that 64GB wired - night and day how much faster it is vs. When you are are running an application load that uses less than 64GB of wired memory, the impact if that is about a 0.25 to 1% reduction in real world application performance. In the Mac Pro 2013 - going past 64GB means using 32GB dimms which take you from 1866MHz down to 1333MHz memory bus speed. Thanks for you patience in reading this, and for any insight you can offer! System report shows all 128GB recognized, and all cores appear to be functioning as designed.Īnything else I should check? Or is this normal behavior? Single core 372, multi-core 4805.įor the difference between the Geekbench versions, I can only assume they changed the rating system?Īs for the decreasing scores as the RAM increases, I don't know why that would happen. Given the diversity of these platforms, it’s difficult to provide one. Preview support for Linux/ARM and Linux/RISC-V Preview builds are available for Linux/ARM and Linux/RISC-V. Then I realized Geekbench has a 5.1.0 Tryout. Geekbench 5.4, the latest version of Primate Labs’ cross-platform benchmark, is now available for download. I installed all 128GB of the OWC RAM, ran Geekbench again.
I installed 96GB of the OWC RAM (3 each in slots 1-3 and 5-7), ran Geekbench again. I ran Geekbench 4.3.2 Tryout with the 64GB Hynix.
#Geekbench 3 tryout full#
Startup disk is a 1TB SSD, and it's pretty full (about 47GB available). Our forum sponsor had a garage sale, and I bought 2x used 64GB kits of their 1333MHz DDR3. I'm running Mojave 10.14.6, with a Radeon RX 580 8GB card. It came with 64GB Hynix 1333 MHz DDR3 (8GB x8 slots). IIRC, it was a 4.1 flashed to a 5.1, and upgraded to 2x 3.33GHz 6 core Zeon. About 2 years ago I bought a used Mac Pro on the eBay.
0 kommentar(er)
